04
Which portfolio platform is actually worth your time?
Built specifically for designers
Cargo is one of the most established portfolio platforms in the design community and remains a strong default choice. It is built specifically for creatives, keeps the interface focused and uncluttered, and produces sites that tend to look considered without requiring extensive customisation. Students can access it for free, with a paid plan at around $14 per month billed annually. It is not trying to do everything, which is part of what makes it reliable.
ReadyMag sits in a similar space but places a stronger emphasis on typographic control and interaction. It gives you pixel-level precision over layout and access to an extensive font library, with no-code animation tools built in. It is a good choice for designers who want more expressive control over how their site moves and behaves. A free plan is available, with the personal plan starting at $14 per month.
Format is another platform oriented toward creative professionals, offering clean templates and a straightforward building experience. It is less design-forward than Cargo or ReadyMag but more structured and reliable for presenting work clearly. Pricing starts at around $6 per month, making it one of the more accessible paid options.
Design tools moving into site building
Figma Sites launched in 2025 and allows designers to take their existing Figma designs directly to a published website without switching tools. It is currently in open beta and is well-suited to prototypes, portfolios, and landing pages where the design has already been worked out inside Figma. For straightforward portfolio builds, the workflow is efficient. It is still early in development and has limitations compared to more established builders, particularly around CMS and advanced SEO, but as a portfolio tool for someone already working in Figma, it is worth exploring.
No-code builders with design capability
Framer has become increasingly popular among designers for portfolio work. It emerged from a prototyping background and carries that into its building experience, the emphasis is on visual-first design, smooth animations, and rapid iteration. The interface is familiar to anyone comfortable with Figma, and the learning curve is relatively low. It is well-suited to clean, interaction-led portfolio sites, though it has limitations if you need robust CMS or complex content management. A free plan is available, with paid plans starting at around $10 per month.
Webflow is the most powerful tool on this list and the most complex. It gives you granular control over layout, interactions, and content management — generating clean HTML and CSS that behaves predictably across browsers. It is genuinely capable of building anything from a portfolio to a full client site, but the learning curve is steep. For designers willing to invest the time, Webflow is a serious long-term tool. For someone building their first portfolio with limited time, it may be more than the task requires. Pricing starts at $14 per month for basic site hosting.
General website builders
Squarespace is a solid, well-supported option for designers who want professional results without spending significant time learning a platform. Templates are high quality, the interface is polished, and it handles everything from portfolio presentation to basic e-commerce. It is not a tool that will produce especially distinctive-looking sites, but it is reliable and produces work that presents professionally. Plans start at $16 per month with no free tier.
Wix is widely used and highly accessible, with an extensive template library and a straightforward drag-and-drop interface. It is capable of producing a functional portfolio, though it is less oriented toward the design community than other tools on this list and the aesthetic ceiling is lower. Free and paid plans are available, with paid plans starting at around $17 per month.
Ecosystem-dependent platforms
Adobe Portfolio is included in a Creative Cloud subscription, making it effectively free for anyone already paying for Adobe's tools. It is simple to use, integrates with Behance, and gets a portfolio online quickly. The trade-off is limited design flexibility, it is not a tool that offers much room to differentiate or push the presentation of work. For a quick and functional portfolio linked to a Behance presence, it does the job. For anything more considered, you would likely want to look elsewhere.
Which should you use?
That depends on what you need right now. If you are building your first portfolio and want something fast and focused, Cargo or ReadyMag are good starting points, both are built for the design community and produce results that feel intentional. If you already work in Figma and want to move quickly, Figma Sites is worth testing in its current beta form. If you are thinking longer term and are prepared to invest time in learning a more capable tool, Framer and Webflow both offer significantly more room to grow. Squarespace and Format are dependable middle-ground options for those who want quality results with a shorter setup time. Adobe Portfolio makes sense only if you are already in the Creative Cloud ecosystem and need something working quickly.
The platform you build on is a practical decision. What matters most is that your work is visible, clearly presented, and easy to navigate. Start from there.